Site-Selection Agents for Trial Sponsors & CROs

Know before
you activate.

Drop the duds. Surface the gems. Hit your timeline.

Exafi predicts which sites will underperform before you commit activation budget and start-up resources, from real-world signals, not self-reported feasibility surveys.

Your shortlist, re-ranked.
RANKED BY REPUTATION RANKED BY EXAFI
โ–
Flagship cancer center โ€”
TOP OF EVERY SHORTLIST โ–ผ EXCELLENT, BUT SATURATED
18 competing trials for the same participants
Big-name univ. hospital โ€”
STRONG REPUTATION ACTIVATE ยท HOLDS UP
Regional academic center โ€”
USUALLY OVERLOOKED โ–ฒ PRIORITY ACTIVATE
Strong patient density, no trial queue
Community oncology net. โ€”
RARELY SHORTLISTED VERIFY FIRST
The problem
1 in 5
trial sites enroll only a single participant
Phesi analysis of 173 cancer trials, 2023
0% → 0%
the top sites carry over half of all enrollment
Phesi, 2023
~$0K
to run one activated site that enrolls only a single participant
Phesi, 2023
~0%
of trials miss their enrollment timelines
Industry benchmark

Sites get activated based on

Reputation & Experience and Biased self-reported data

You don't find out they were wrong until the budget is spent and participants don't show up.

How it works

Real-world signals ranked sites, before you activate.

Step 01

Share your protocol

Share a protocol summary and candidate-site list. No patient-level data, integration, or platform migration. Protocol content is used only for your analysis, not to train shared models.

Step 02

exafi scores every site

Our AI-powered engine scores each site on proprietary signals, dropping the duds and surfacing the unexpected gems.

Patient density Investigator track record Trial saturation Compliance history

Step 03

Activate the winners

Take a ranked, explained shortlist into your selection meeting, and commit only to the sites that will actually enroll.

Every activation makes the agents smarter.


PROTOCOL-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS

How Exafi ranks 188 sites for an NSCLC protocol.

The names on every shortlist.
By reputation and experience
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
How exafi ranks them RANKED BY EXAFI
Open lanes Strong patient access, near zero competing trial load
Prestige โ‰  availability 2 of your 4 picks, running 12 to 18 competing trials for the same participants

Illustrative protocol-specific ranking based on site and trial signals available as of July 2026. Scores are relative to this protocol, not measures of overall institutional quality.


The pilot

Run it on a real activation decision.

Send us a trial and a candidate site list. We run it through exafi and send back a scored, ranked shortlist, with the reasons behind every site, so you activate the ones that will actually enroll.

  • No platform contract. A scoped pilot on one real activation, not a year-long commitment.
  • Every site scored 0 to 100, with plain-English reasons you can defend internally.
  • A ranked shortlist you can use this cycle, delivered fast.

Please don't submit confidential files here. We'll arrange secure transfer after an NDA.

Tell us about your trial

We reply within a day with next steps.

Something went wrong. Please email fiona@exafi.ai directly.

Paid pilot ยท we'll share pricing when we follow up.

โœ“

Thanks, we're on it.

We'll review your trial and follow up within a day with next steps and pricing.